- احمدی گیوی، حسن و انوری، حسن (1375). دستور زبان فارسی، ویرایش دوم. تهران: فاطمی.
- انوشه، مزدک (1397). «محمولهای ثانویه در زبان فارسی، رویکردی کمینهگرا». پژوهشهای زبانی، س 9، ش 2: 1-21.
- راسخمهند، محمد (1382). «قید فعل و قید جمله در زبان فارسی»، زبانشناسی، سال هجدهم، شمارة اول، 95-101.
- راسخمهند، محمد (1399). «او کور به دنیا آمد؛ معرفی ساخت تشریحی در زبان فارسی». نامه فرهنگستان، ش 67: 60 -74.
- طباطبایی، علاءالدین (1395). فرهنگ توصیفی دستور زبان فارسی. تهران: فرهنگ معاصر.
- کریمی دوستان، غلامحسین و وحیده تجلی (1398). «نگاهی نو به قید حالت در زبان فارسی»، جستارهای زبانی، ش 52: 259-281.
- Boas, H. C. (2003). Resultative constructions in English and German, Stanford: CSLI Publications.
- Broccias, C. (2004). “The cognitive basis of adjectival and adverbial resultative constructions.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 2: 103-126.
- Culicover, P. and Jackendoff, R. (1997). “Semantic subordination despite syntactic coordination”, Linguistic Inquiry, 28, 2: 195–217.
- Davidson, D. (1969). “The Individuation of Events”. In: N. Resher (ed.). Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel. Dordrecht: Reidel. 216–234.
- Foli, R.; Harley, H.; and Karimi, S. (2005). “Determinants of event types in Persian complex predicates”, Lingua, 115 (10): 1365-1401.
- Geuder, W. (2000). Oriented Adverbs. Issues in the Lexical Semantics of Event Verbs. PhD dissertation, Konstanz.
- Goldberg, A. (1991). “A semantic account of resultatives”. Linguistic Analysis, 21:66-96.
- Goldberg, A. E; & Jackendoff, R. (2004). “The English resultative as a family of constructions”, Language, 80: 532-568.
- Halliday, Michael A. K. (1967). “Notes on transitivity and theme in English”, part 1, Journal of Linguistics, 3: 37-81.
- Himmelmann, N. P. and Schultze-Berndt, E. (2005). “Issues in the syntax and semantics of participant-oriented adjuncts: an introduction”. Himmelmann, N. P. and Schultze-Berndt, E. (eds.). Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification: The Typology of Depictives, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hoekstra, T. (1988). “Small clause results”, Lingua, 74: 101–39.
- Huddleston, R. and Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Kratzer, A. (1995). “Stage-level and Individual-level Predicates”. In: G. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (eds.). The Generic Book. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press. 125–175
- Kratzer, A. (2005). “Building Resultatives”. In: Event Arguments in Syntax, Semantics, and Discourse, ed. C. Maienbom and A. Wollenstein-Leisten. Ttibingen: Niemeyer. 177-212.
- Levin, B., and Rappaport Hova, M. (1990). “Wiping the slate clean: A lexical semantic exploration”, Cognition, 41: 55-123.
- Levin, B., and Rappaport Hova, M. (1995). Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Nichols, Johanna (1978). Secondary Predicates. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkley Linguistics Society, 114-127.
- Richter, Michael; van Hout, Roeland (2010). “Why some verbs can form a resultative construction while others cannot: Decomposing semantic binding”.
Lingua. 120 (8): 2006–2021.
doi:
10.1016/j.lingua.2010.02.007
- Rothstein, S. (2006). “Secondary Predication”. In: M. Everaert and H.V. Riemsdijk (Eds). The Blackwell Companion to Syntax (IV: 209-234). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
- Schultze-Berndt, E and Himmelmann, N. P. (2004). “Depictive secondary predicates in crosslinguistic perspective”. Linguistic Typology, 8: 59-131.
- Simpson, J. (1983). “Resultatives”. In Papers in Lexical-Functional Grammar. Levin, L., Rappaport, M. and A. Zaenen (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. 143-157.
- Stump, G. T. (1985). The semantic variability of absolute constructions. Dordrecht/ Boston / Lancaster: Dr. Riedel Publishing Company.
- Wechsler, S. (2001). “An analysis of English resultatives under the event-argument homomorphism model of telicity”. Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Text Structure, University of Texas, Austin, October 2000, 13–15.
- Wechsler, S. (2005). “Resultatives under the event-argument-homomorphism model of telicity”. In: Erteschik-Shir, N., Rapoport, T. (Eds.), The Syntax of Aspect—Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation, Oxford University Press, 255–273.
)