وجهیت، نمود و نفی در فارس

نوع مقاله : نقد

نویسنده

دانشجوی دکتری زبان‌شناسی همگانی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی

چکیده

وجهیت، نمود و نفی در فارس

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


-  کلانتری، راحله (1391)، «مروری بر کتاب وجهیت، نمود و نفی در فارسی»، دستور، ویژه‌نامه فرهنگستان، ش 8: 289-299.
-  Abraham, Werner (2002), “Modal verbs: Epistemics in German and English”, In Modality and its Interaction with the Verbal System, Sjef Barbiers, Frits Beukema & Wim van der Wurff (eds), 19–50, Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benjamins;
-  Brame, Michael (1976), Conjectures and Refutations in Syntax and Semantics, Amsterdam: North Holland;
-  Culicover, Peter W. & Ray Jackendoff (2001), “Control is not movement”, In Linguistics Inquiry 32(3): 493–512;
-  Dabir-Moghaddam, Mohammad (1985), Syntax and Semantics of Causative Construction in Persian, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign;
-  Darzi, Ali (1996), Word Order, NP-Movement, and Opacity Conditions in Persian, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign;
-  Drubig, Hans Bernhard (2001), On the Syntactic form of Epistemic Modality, Ms, University of Tubingen;
-  Ghomeshi, Jila (1997), Projection and Inflection: A study of Persian Structure, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto;
-  Ghomeshi, Jila (2001), “Control and thematic agreement”, In Canadian Journal in Linguistics 46(1-2): 9-40;
-  Hajati, Ali (1977), Ke-Construction in Persian: Descriptive and Theoretical Aspects. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign;
-  Hashimipour, Margaret (1989), Pronominalization and Control in Persian, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
-  Hornstein, Norbert (1999), “Movement and control”, In Linguistics Inquiry30(1): 69–96;
-  Karimi, Simin (1989), Aspects of Persian Syntax, Specificity, and the Theory of Grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle;
-  Karimi, Simin (1999), “Specificity effect: Evidence from Persian”, In Linguistic Review 16(2): 125-141;
-  Karimi, Simin (2005), A Minimalist Approach to Scrambling: Evidence from Persian, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
-  Kayne, Richard (1994), The Antisymmetry of Syntax, Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
-  Landau, Idan (2000), Elements of Control,Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
-  Moyne, John Abel (1974), The Structure of Verbal Constructions in Persian. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.
-  Palmer, Frank Robert (2001), Mood and Modality, New York NY: CUP.
-  Rizzi, Luigi (1982), Issues in Italian Syntax, Dordrecht: Foris.
-  Rizzi, Luigi (1986a), “Null objects in Italian and the Theory of pro”, In Linguistics Inquiry 17: 501-557.
-  Roberts, Ian (1985), “Agreement parameters and the development of English modal auxiliaries”, In Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 21-58.
-  Rosenbaum, Peter S. (1967), The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions, Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
-  Ross, John Robert (1969), “Auxiliaries as main verbs”, In W.Todd (eds.), Studies in Philosophical Linguistics, Series One, W.Todd (eds), 77-102, Evanston IL: Great Expectations Press.
-  Soheili Isfahani, Abolghasem (1976), Noun Phrase Complementation in Persian, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign.
-  Vikner, Sten (1988), “Modals in Danish and event expression”, In Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 39: 1-33.
-  Williams, Edwin (1980), “Predication”, In Linguistics Inquiry1: 203–238.
-  Wurmbrand, Susi (1998), Infinitives,Ph.D. dissertation, Cambridge MA: MIT.
-  Wurmbrand, Susi (1999), “Modal verbs must be raising verbs”, In WCCFL 18 Proceedings, Sonya Bird, Andrew Carnie, Jason Haugen & Peter Norquest (eds.), 599–612. Somerville MA: Cascadilla press.
-  Zubizaretta, Maria Luisa (1982), On the Relationship of the Lexicon to Syntax, Ph.D. dissertation, Cambridge MA: MIT.