The juncture-nexus relations of continuous SVC in Persian language

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 University of Isfahan Department of Linguistics

2 University of Isfahan

10.22084/rjhll.2025.29878.2341

Abstract

Introduction
In many languages ​​of the world, several verbs act together as a unit, forming a single predicate. This set of verbs is known as a “serial verb construction”. SVC is divided into two categories according to its constituent verbs: symmetrical and asymmetrical. In an asymmetrical SVC, one verb is selected from a closed grammatical and semantic class paired with another verb from an open class. Among asymmetrical SVCs, stage or phase constructions represent a specific subtype that encodes different temporal stages of an event or action, with continuous SVCs constituting a particular kind of such phase constructions. In Persian, the verb "dâštan" ‘to have’ forms a complex predicate with the main verb, and in addition to being used to form a continuous grammatical aspect, it also expresses a continuous lexical aspect, especially when the main verb is of the continuous type, in which case we will witness a continuous lexical aspect. In the present study, in order to investigate the continuous aspect of a continuous verb in Persian, based on the exemplary criteria for recognizing the continuous construction from the perspective of Aichenvald (2018) and within the framework of the role and reference grammar of Van Valin (2005), data were collected from Najafi's Persian vernacular dictionary, websites, and other research works.
 
Review of Literature
Sadeghi and Arzhang (1979) conceptualize “aspect” as characterizing verbal action in terms of beginning, termination, or progression. Jahanpanah-Tehrani (1984) notes that the Persian verb “dâštan” expresses continuous aspect when paired with progressive verbs. Mahoutian (1999) establishes a grammatical-semantic typology of aspect, while Ahmadi-Givi (1981) and Ahmadi-Givi and Anvari (1983) analyze Persian continuous tenses (present and past) as constructions combining “dâštan” with activity verbs (e.g., "to study", "to play") to denote progressive actions or states. Gulfam (2006) suggests a binary classification of aspectual encoding: lexical vs. grammatical, a distinction elaborated by Rezaei (2012a, 2012b), who identifies three functions of "dâštan" and differentiates lexically-determined aspect from grammatically-marked one. Mousavi (2009) characterizes Persian continuous constructions as encoding imperfect aspect, whereas Farshidvard (2012) categorizes verbal features into five groups based on temporal properties (initiation, duration, completion, etc.). Furthermore, Rezaei (2015) and Anousheh (2018) analyze these continuous constructions as instantiating serial verb constructions. The present study aims to investigate the continuous aspect within the framework of Role and Reference Grammar (RRG).
 
Method
In order for determining the appearance of the sequential verb structure as one of the complex structures of the language, in addition to examining the type of action of the main verb, these questions are raised: what units the serial structure is composed of and what is the relationship between its constituent units. According to the layered structure of the clause (LSC), the core, the center, and the clause are the constituent units of complex sentences, and the relationship between these units is illustrated within the framework of the universal juncture-nexus model. Juncture includes the types of the core, center and clause. A nuclear juncture is made up of several nuclei, a central juncture is the result of the combination of several centers, and each center may be complex and include a nuclear juncture, a clause juncture is made up of several clauses, and each clause may be completely independent of the other clauses (Van Valin and Lapola, 1997: 442-448). The syntactic relationship between the internal units of complex structures is called a nexus relation, which includes three levels of coordination, subordination, and co-subordination. In complex predicates, the closer the semantic connection between two verb structures is, the stronger the syntactic relationship they have, and the weaker the semantic connection, the weaker the syntactic relationship.
 
Discussion
In the examples, “u dârad dars mi-xânad” ‘S/He is studying’ and “dâštand mi-gereftand mi-xâbidand” ‘They were taking sleeping’, the verb "dâštan" expresses a progressive aspect for the unit, considering the basic concept of continuity of the next verb. In all examples, “that” comes before the verb “dâštan” and it does not come between two verb parts, so its domain is the entire structure, which indicates a single predicate. Moreover, the verb “dâštan” always encodes the progressive aspect for the entire structure, considering the concept of continuity of the next verb. Serial verb constructions (SVCs) exhibit a single intonational contour when the constituent verbs are contiguous and no intervening subject separates them, in contrast when non-contiguous, the constituent verbs no longer share this single intonational pattern and instead show distinct prosodic features. The components of a serial verb construction must have the same tense, aspect, mood and polarity. Similarly, based on the data, the verb “dâštan” has the same tense, aspect, mood as the main verb. For example, in the sentence “dârad dars mi-xânad” ‘He is studying’, both verbs convey the present tense and, in this sentence, “dâštand mi-gereftand mi-xâbidand” ‘They were sleeping’, both verbs contain the past tense. Both examples include the same person and number and the second verb expresses a continuous aspect for the entire construction. According to the data, the verb “dâštan” with the main verb codifies a single event and has at least one shared argument (the syntactic subject). In the example “dârad dars mi-xânad” ‘he is studying’, “he” is the subject between the two verbs, “to have” and “to study”. Both verbs match the preferred syntactic subject in terms of person and number and have nuclear juncture. Also, the verb “to have” is not a predicate, but a modifier that is represented in the projective of the operator. In the same way, the verb “to study” which is an action verb, conveys a progressive aspect. As a result, this construction has a nuclear subordination nexus-juncture relation.
 
Conclusion
The findings of this study support the analysis that the combination of the light verb “dâštan” ‘to have’ with a main verb constitutes a type of progressive serial verb construction (SVC). In this construction, the initial verb (dâštan) contributes aspectual features to the main verb. Within the Role and Reference Grammar (RRG) framework and based on empirical analysis, the progressive aspect is indicated to be expressed through a complex predicate including two (or three) verbs that jointly encode a single event. Consequently, the continuous aspect construction in Persian illustrates two distinct juncture-nexus relations within the RRG framework: a. nuclear subordination and b. nuclear co-subordination.
 
References

Abolhasani Chime, z. (2004). Aspectual verbs in Persian. University of Allameh Tabatabai, 25-32.
Ahmadi Givi, H. (2001). Historical Grammar of verb (Vols. 1,2). tehran: Ghatreh.
Amiri, M. (2021). Aspect in Persian based on Functional Discourse Grammar. Language & Linguistics, 17(33), 195-240.
Anoushe, M. (2019). Serial verb construction in Persian: A Minimalist Approch. Journal of reserch in linguistics, 11(1), 73-91.
Davari, S., & Naghzguy Kohan, M. (2017). Auxiliary verbs in Persian: Grammaticalization. Tehran: WEbsite Taaghche.
Farshidvard, K. (2012). Historical Grammar of Persian. Tehran: Zavvar.
Golfam, A. (2007). Principles of Grammar. Tehran: Samt.
Mahootian, S. (2001). Persian Descriptive Grammars. Samaei, Mahdi,. Tehran: Markez.
Mousavi, S. (2011). An Analysis of Serial Verb Constructions (SVCs) in Persian, M.A. Thesis. Isfahan: University of Isfahan.
Naghzguy Kohan, M. (2011). Modal Verbs and the Concept of Exponence. Adab Pazhuhi, 4(14), 93-10.
Najafi, A. (2008). A Popular Persian Dictionary. Tehran: Niloofar.
Rasekh Mahand, M. (2014). The emergence of double verbs in Persian. Comparative Linguistic Research, 4(7), 69-95.
Rezai, V. (2012). The Progressive Aspect and Its Manifestation in Contemporary Persian. Literary Arts, 4(1), 79-92.
Rezai, V. (2013). A syntactic and semantic investigation of static verbs in Persian. Journal of Linguistics & Khorasan Dialects, 4(7), 23-38.
Rezai, V. (2015). Serial or double verb . Mashhad Linguistics Confrence.
Rezai, V. (2016). A Typological Prororype Approch to Infinitives, Verbal Nouns and HACsele Masdar. Journal of Research in Llinguistics, 8(1), 1-16.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  • ابوالحسنی چیمه، زهرا (1383). «افعال نمودی در زبان فارسی». مجموعه مقالات دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، ش186: 25-32
  • احمدی گیوی، حسن (1380). دستور تاریخی فعل. قطره، تهران،
  • امیری، محمدعارف، دبیرمقدم، محمد و همکاران (1400). «نمود در زبان فارسی از منظر دستور گفتمان نقش­گرا». زبان و زبان­شناسی، 17، 33: 195-240.
  • انوشه، مزدک (1397). «نمود دستوری در ساخت فعل­های پیاپی در زبان فارسی: رویکردی کمینه­گرا». نشریه پژوهش­های زبان­شناسی. 1،20: 73-91.
  • داوری، شادی و نغزگوی‌کهن، مهرداد (1396). افعال معین در زبان فارسی. نسخه الکترونیک. سایت طاقچه.
  • راسخ مهند، محمد (1393). «پیدایش افعال دوگانه در زبان فارسی». پژوهش­های زبان­شناسی تطبیقی، 4-7: 69-95
  • رضایی، والی (1391الف). «بررسی نحوی و معنایی فعل­های ایستا در زبان فارسی»، زبان­شناسی و گویش‌های خراسان، سال چهارم، شماره هفتم، 23-38.
  • رضایی، والی (1391ب). «نمود استمراری در فارسی معاصر»، فنون ادبی، سال چهارم، شماره1، پیاپی6: 79-92
  • رضایی، والی (1394). «فعل متوالی یا دوگانه»، سومین همایش ملی زبان­شناسی و آموزش زبان فارسی، مشهد.
  • صادقی، علی اشرف و ارژنگ، غلامرضا (1358). دستور سال چهارم دبیرستان رشته فرهنگ و ادب. آموزش و پرورشک نشر گیل.
  • فرشیدورد، خسرو (1391). دستور مختصر تاریخی زبان فارسی. تهران، زوّار
  • فرشیدورد، خسرو (1391). دستور مختصر زبان فارسی، تهران: زوّار.
  • گلفام، ارسلان (1386). اصول دستور زبان. تهران، سمت.
  • ماهوتیان، شهرزاد (1378)، دستور زبان فارسی از دیدگاه رده­شناختی، مهدی سمائی، تهران، انتشارات نشر مرکز.
  • موسوی، سیدحمزه (1389). ساخت فعل­های متوالی در زبان فارسی. پایان­نامه کارشناسی ارشد زبان­شناسی، دانشگاه اصفهان.
  • نجفی، ابوالحسن (1378). فرهنگ فارسی عامیانه. تهران، نیلوفر.
  • نغزگوی‌کهن، مهرداد (1389). «افعال نمود و نمایش نمود در زبان فارسی». ادب پژوهی، 14: 93-110
  • A.Y. (2018). Recognizing Serial Verb, Oxford, Oxford University.
  • Binnik, R. I. (2006). Aspect and Aspectuality. In B. Aarts and A. McMahon, (eds.), the Handbook of English Linguistics, Oxford, Blackwell.
  • Butt, Mariam (1995). The structure of Complex Predicates in Urdu. CSLI Publications, Stanford, California.
  • Christaller, R. (1875). A Grammar of the Asante and Fante Language Called Tshi, Basel, Republished (1964) by Gregg, Ridgewood.
  • Comrie, Bernard(1976). Aspect, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Dik, S. (1997).The theory of Functional Grammar: Part1: The Structure of the Clause. Berlin/NewYork: Mounton de Gruyter.
  • Freed, Alice. F (1979). The semantics of English Aspectual complementation, Dordrecht, Hollan, D. Reidel Publishing Company
  • Kilian-Hatz, Christa (2006). Serial verb constructions in Khwe (Centeral-Khoisan), In A.Y. Aikhenvald and R.M.W. Dixon, Serial Verb Constructions: A Cross-linguistic Typology (108-123), Oxford: NewYork.
  • Nolan,B. (2017). The syntactic realization of complex events and complex predicates in situations of Irish Argument Realisation, In Brian Nolan & Elke Diedrichsen [eds], Complex Predicates and Complex Events: Verb-verb constructions at the syntax-semantic interface (13-43), John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam.
  • Pavey, Emma. L. (2010). The structure of language an Introduction to Grammatical Analysis, Cambridge University Press.
  • Saeed, John, I. (2003). Semantics. Malden. MA: Blackwell Publishers
  • Smith, C. S. (1997). The parametr of aspect. (Second Edition) London: Kluwer Academic Press.
  • Taleghani, Azita. H (2006). The interaction of modality, aspect and negation in Persian. Doctoral dissertation, university of Arizona.
  • Tragel, Ilona. (2017). Serial verb constructions in Estonian. In Brian Nolan &ElkeDiedrichsen [eds], Complex Predicates and Complex Events: Verb-verb constructions at the syntax-semantic interface, (169-190), John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam.
  • Van Hout, A. (2016). Lexical and Grammatical Aspect. In j. Lidz, W. Synder, & J. Pater (Eds.), the Oxford Handbook of Developmental Linguistics, (587-610), Oxford University Press.
  • Van Valin, R. (2005). Exploring the syntax-semantics interface, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Van Valin.R.D. and Randy Lapolla. J. (1997). Syntax: structure, meaning and function, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.