Constituent ordering constructions: Evidence from the Persian left-periphery

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Shahrood University of Technology

Abstract

Persian owns a flexible syntax and is thought to be a free word order language. In this paper, employing a Role and Reference Grammar framework, we argue that constituent reordering in preposing and left-dislocation constructions of the Persian left-periphery is the result of the interface between information-discourse structure, on the one hand, and a certain syntactic position in the layered structure of the clause, on the other: topical, focused, and contrastive constituents are hosted respectively by the left-detached position, pre-core slot, and kontrast position. Bear in mind that each position requires a certain discourse condition to be met. We also show that non-canonical constituent orders at the Persian left-periphery are not merely a rearrangement of syntactic units for pragmatic reasons, they are in effect ‘constituent ordering constructions’ in line with the notion of construction as proposed and defined in the RRG theory.

Keywords

References

  • دبیرمقدم، محمد، (1384). «پیرامون «را» در زبان فارسی، تجدید چاپ‌شده در دبیرمقدم»، پژوهش‌های زبان‌شناختی فارسی. تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی، 146-83.
  • دبیرمقدم، محمد، (1392). رده­شناسی زبان­های ایرانی. جلد اول. تهران: سمت.
  • راسخ­مهند، محمد، (1382). قلب نحوی در زبان فارسی، رسالۀ دکتری. دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
  • راسخ­مهند، محمد، (1384). «بررسی انواع تأکید در زبان فارسی»، زبان و زبان­شناسی، س. 1، ش. 1، 19-5.
  • راسخ­مهند، محمد، (1385). «ارتباط قلب نحوی و تأکید در زبان فارسی»، دستور، ش. 2، 66-56.
  • راسخ­مهند، محمد و قیاسوند، مریم، (1393). «بررسی پیکره­بنیاد تأثیر عوامل نقشی در قلب نحوی کوتاه فارسی»، دستور، س. 10، 198-163.
  • شهیدی، نوشین، (1379). مبتداسازی در زبان فارس با نگاهی نقشگرا. پایان­نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد. دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
  • طباطبایی، نازنین، (1395). «وضعیت اطلاعی سازه­های جمله با ترتیب نشاندار»، پژوهش­های زبان­شناسی تطبیقی، س. 6، ش. 11، 145-133.
  • طباطبایی، نازنین و مدرسی قوامی، گلناز، (1396). «کارکردهای گفتمانی تغییر ترتیب موضوع­های اصلی جمله در زبان فارسی»، پژوهش­های زبان­شناسی تطبیقی، س. 7، ش. 13، 97-85.
  • معزی­پور، فرهاد، (1397). ««را» نشانۀ مبتدای ثانویه؟»، دستور، ش. 14، 128-75.
  • معزی­پور، فرهاد، (a1398). «قالب­های نحوی-ساخت اطلاعی مفعول مستقیم در زبان فارسی»، جستارهای زبانی، س. 10، ش. 4، 204-173.
  • معزی­پور، فرهاد، (b1398). «بحثی در باب چپ­نشـانی و چالش­های نظـری آن برای دستـور نقش و ارجـاع»، پژوهش‌های زبان­شناسی، س. 11، ش. 2، 64-45.
  • معزی­پور، فرهاد، (c1398). «بازتحلیلی نقشگرا از دوگان­سازی واژه­بستی مفعول در فارسی»، زبان­شناسی و گویش­های خراسان، س. 11، ش. 1، 259-227.
  • موسوی، ندا، (1387). «بررسی آکوستیکی قلب نحوی مفعول صریح در زبان فارسی»، زبان و زبان­شناسی، س. 4، ش. 7، 143-124.
  • ناتل­خانلری، پرویز، (1351). دستور زبان فارسی. تهران: بنیاد فرهنگ ایران.
  • والی، رضایی و طیب، محمد تقی، (1385). «ساخت اطلاع و ترتیب سازه­های جمله»، دستور، ش. 2، 19-3.
  • وزین­پور، نادر، (1355). دستور زبان فارسی. تهران: سپاهیان انقلاب.
  • Adli, Aria. (2010). “Constraint cumulativity and gradience: Wh-scrambling in Persian”, Lingua 120(9), 2259-2294.
  • Bentley, Delia. (2008). The interplay of focus structure and syntax. In Investigations of the Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface, Robert D. Van Valin (ed.), 263-284. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Birner, Betty & Mahootian, Shahrzad. (1996), “Functional constraints on inversion in English and Farsi. Language Sciences 18(1-2), 127-138.
  • Boyle, John A. 1966. Grammar of Modern Persian. Wiesbaden: Otto harrassowitz.
  • Butler, Christopher & Gonzálvez-García, Francisco. (2014). Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Clair, Nathaniel. (2016). Differential Object Marking in Spoken Persian: Towards an Enriched Typology. MA Thesis. California: University of California, Santa Cruz.
  • Comrie, Bernard. (1981). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Czypionka, Anna. (2007). “Word order and focus position in the world's languages”, Linguistische Berichte 212(16), 439-454.
  • Dalrymple, Mary & Nikolaeva, Irina. (2011). Objects and Information Structure. Cambridge: CUP.
  • Dowty, David. (1976). Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Springer.
  • Elwell-Sutton, Laurence. (1972). Elementary Persian Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.
  • Faghiri, Pegah & Samvelian, Pollet. (2014). Constituent ordering in Persian and the weight factor In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics, C. Piñón (ed.), 215-232.
  • Faghiri, Pegah, Samvelian, Pollet & Hemforth, Barbara. (2014). Accessibility and word order: The case ditransitive constructions in Persian. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, S. Müller (ed.), 218-237.
  • Faghiri, Pegah, Samvelian, Pollet & Hemforth, Barbara. (2018). Is there a canonical order in Persian ditransitive constructions? Corpus-based and experimental studies. In Ditransitive Constructions in a Crosslinguistic Perspective, A. Korn & A. Malchukov (eds.), 165-185. Reichert Verlag.
  • Foley, William. (2007). Typology of information packaging in the clause. In Language Typology and Syntactic description, Vol.3, T. Shopen (ed.), 362-446. Cambridge: CUP.
  • Foroughy, Mohammad-Ali. (1944). A Concise Persian Grammar. New York: Orientalia.
  • Frommer, Paul. (1981). Postverbal Phenomena in Colloquial Persian Syntax. PhD dissertation, California: University of Southern California, Los Angeles,
  • Ganjavi, Shadi. (2003). Scrambling in Persian is not focus driven. In WCCFL 22: Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, G. Garding & M. Tsujimura (eds.), 193-206. Cascadilla Press.
  • Ganjavi, Shadi. (2007). Direct Objects in Persian. PhD dissertation, California: University of Southern.
  • Geluykens, Ronald. (1992). From Discourse Process to Grammatical Construction: On Left-Dislocation in English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Geluykens, Ronald. (1993). Syntactic, semantic and interactional prototypes: The case of left-dislocation. In Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language, R. Geiger & B. Rudzka-Ostyn (eds.), 709-730. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Ghomeshi, Jila. (1997). “Topics in Persian VPs”, Lingua 102(2-3), 133-167.
  • Givón, Talmy. (1984). Syntax: A Functional-typological Introduction, Vol. 1. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Goldberg, Adele. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press.
  • Goldberg, Adele. (2006). Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalisation in Language. Oxford: OUP.
  • Gregory, Michelle & Michaelis, Laura. (2001). “Topicalization and left-dislocation: A functional opposition revisited”, Journal of Pragmatics 33(11), 1665-1706.
  • Haspelmath, Martin. )2013(. Argument indexing: A conceptual framework for the syntactic status of bound person forms. In Languages Across Boundaries, D. Bakker & M. Haspelmath (eds.), 197-226. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Herring, Susan. (1990). Information structure as a consequence of word order type. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Berkeley Linguistics Society, 163-174. Berkeley Linguistics Society.
  • Hoffmann, Thomas & Trousdale, Graeme. (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: OUP.
  • Iemmolo, Giorgio. (2010). “Topicality and differential object marking: Evidence from Romance and beyond”, Studies in Language 34(2), 239-272.
  • Iemmolo, Giorgio. (2011). Towards a Typological Study of Differential Object Marking and Differential Object Indexation. PhD dissertation, University of Pavia.
  • Jügel, Thomas & Samvelian, pollet. (2020). Topic agreement, experiencer constructions, and the weight of clitics. In Advances in Iranian Linguistics, R. Larson, S. Moradi & V. Samiian (eds.), 137-153. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Jügel, Thomas. (2019). The development of the object marker in Middle Persian. In Proceedings of The Eighth European Conference of Iranian Studies, P. Lurje (ed.), 203-220. Saint Petersburg: The State Hermitage Publishers
  • Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan. (2009). The Syntax of Sentential Stress. Oxford: OUP.
  • Karimi, Simin & Smith, Ryan. (2020). Another look at Persian rā: A single formal analysis of a multi-functional morpheme. In Advances in Iranian Linguistics, R. Larson, S. Moradi & V. Samiian (eds.), 155-172. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Karimi, Simin. (1989). Aspects of Persian Syntax, Specificity, and the Theory of Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Washington.
  • Karimi, Simin. (1990). “Obliqueness, specificity, and discourse functions: -Ra in Persian”, Linguistic Analysis 20(3-4), 139-191.
  • Karimi, Simin. (1994). Word-order variations in contemporary spoken Persian. In Persian Studies in North America: Studies in Honor of Mohammad Ali Jazayery, M. Marashi (ed.), 43-73. IBEX Publishers.
  • Karimi, Simin. (1996). “Case and specificity: Persian -ra revisited”, Linguistic Analysis 26(3-4), 174-194.
  • Karimi, Simin. (1999). Is scrambling as strange as we think it is? In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 33: Papers on Morphology and Syntax, Cycle One, K. Arregi, B. Bruening, C. Krause & V. Lin (eds.), 159-190. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Karimi, Simin. (2003). On object positions, specificity, and scrambling in Persian. In Word Order and Scrambling, Karimi (ed.), 91-124. Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Karimi, Simin. (2005). A Minimalist Approach to Scrambling: Evidence from Persian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Kiss, Katalin É. (1995). Discourse Configurational Languages. Oxford: OUP.
  • Kiss, Katalin É. (1998). “Identificational focus versus information focus”, Language 74(2), 245-274.
  • Lambrecht, Knud & Michaelis, Laura. (1998). “Sentence accent in information questions: Default and projection”, Linguistics & Philosophy 21(5), 477-544.
  • Lambrecht, Knud. (1981). Topic, Antitopic and Verb Agreement in Non-Standard French. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Lambrecht, Knud. (1994). Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP.
  • Lambrecht, Kund. (2000). “When subjects behave like objects”, Studies in Language 24(3), 611-682.
  • Lambrecht, Kund. (2001). In Language Universals and Language Typology: An International Handbook, M. Haspelmath, E. Konig, W. Osterreicher & W. Raible (eds.), 1050-1078. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Lazard, Gilbert. (1982). “Le morpheme -ra en Persan et les relations actancielles”, Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 77(1), 177-208.
  • Mahootian, Shahrzad. (2008). Inversion and topicalization in Farsi discourse. In Aspects of Iranian Linguistics, S. Karimi, V. Samiian & D. Stilo (eds.), 277-288. Cambridge Scholarly Publishing.
  • Moinzadeh, Ahmad. (2001). an Antisymmetric, Minimalist Approach to Persian Phrase Structure. PhD dissertation, University of Ottawa.
  • Nikolaeva, Irina. (2001). “Secondary topic as a relation in information structure”, Linguistics 39(1), 1-49.
  • Nolan, Brian. (2010). The layered structure of the Irish word: An RRG account of inflectional and derivation processes. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Role and Reference Grammar (RRG 2009), W. Nakamura (ed), 228-242.
  • Nolan, Brian. (2012). “The GET constructions of Modern Irish and Irish English: GET-passive and GET-recipient variations”, Linguistics 50(6), 1111-1161.
  • Nolan, Brian. (2013a). Constructional polysemy and argument realization with the Irish GET verb. In Argument Structure in Flux: The Naples-Capri Papers, E. van Gelderen, J. Barðdal & M. Cennamo (eds.), 87-116. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Nolan, Brian. (2013b). Constructions as grammatical objects: A case study of the prepositional ditransitive construction in Modern Irish. In Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics: The role of constructions in grammar, B. Nolan & E. Diedrichsen (eds.), 143-178. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Polinsky, Maria. (1995). “Double objects in causatives: Towards a study of coding conflict”, Studies in Language, 19(1), 129-221.
  • Rezai, Vali. (2003). A Role and Reference Grammar Analysis of Simple Sentences in Modern Persian (Farsi). PhD dissertation, Isfahan University.
  • Roberts, John, Delforooz, Behrooz & Jahani, Carina. (2009). A Study of Persian Discourse Structure. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
  • Shafiei, Soheila. (2014). “Postposing and information structure in English and Farsi/Persian”, Romanian Journal of English Studies, 11(1), 48-55.
  • Van Valin, Robert & LaPolla, Randy. (1997). Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: CUP.
  • Van Valin, Robert. (2005). Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP.
  • Vendler, Zeno. (1967). Linguistics and philosophy. Cornell University Press.
  • Windfuhr, Gernot. (2009). Persian. In The World's Major Languages, B. Comrie (ed.), 445-459.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics