Referential predictability of event participants and the choice of referential forms in Persian discourse

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Literature, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Referential predictability refers to the next-mention likelihood of event participants which plays a crucial role in discourse comprehension. This article aims to explore referential predictability of participant roles such as agent, recipient and theme, their referential forms and the effect of grammatical aspect on predictability in Persian discourse. To this end, 75 Persian speakers participated in a story completion task in which they read transfer-of-possession sentences in one of three conditions of perfective, imperfective, and progressive imperfective aspects and provided a continuation to the sentences. The data were collected and analyzed using Chi-square test. Results showed that grammatical aspect had a significant effect on the predictability of event participants. Also, it was found that the recipient role had a greater predictability in transfer-of-possession events in Persian, but it was the agent role (in the subject position) the enjoyed greater accessibility given that it was mostly referred to by null-pronouns.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  • استاجی، اعظم (1385). «گذر از مالکیت به نمود در زبان فارسی». نشریة دانشکدة ادبیات و علوم انسانی دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، 16: 1-15.
  • رضایی، والی (1391). «نمود استمراری در فارسی معاصر». فنون ادبی، 4(1): 79-92.
  • گلشائی، رامین؛ مختاری، بهناز و حق‌بین، فریده (1400). «بررسی روان‌-زبان‌شناختی تأثیر نمود دستوری بر تفسیر ضمیر فاعلی مبهم و روابط گفتمانی در زبان فارسی». پژوهش‌های زبانی، 12(1): 193-218.
  • نغزگوی‌کهن، مهرداد (1389). «افعال معین و نمایش نمود در زبان فارسی». ادب‌پژوهی، 14: 93-110.
  • Anderson, S. E., Matlock, T., Spivey, M. (2013). “Grammatical aspect and temporal distance in motion descriptions”, Front. Psychol., 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00337.
  • Ariel, M. (1988). Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics, 24, 65-87.
  • Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.
  • Arnold J. E., Eisenband, J.G., Brown-Schmidt, S., and Trueswell, J.C. (2000). “The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking”. Cognition, 76, B13–26.
  • Arnold, J. E. (1998). Reference form and discourse patterns. Unpublished dissertation, Stanford University.
  • Arnold, J. E. (2001). “The effects of thematic roles on pronoun use and frequency of reference”. Discourse Processes, 31(2): 137-162.
  • Arnold, J. E. (2008). “Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes”. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23: 495–527.
  • Arnold, J. E. (2010), “How Speakers Refer: The Role of Accessibility”. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4: 187-203.
  • Bock, J. K., & Warren, R. K. (1985). “Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation”. Cognition, 21(1): 47–67.
  • Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems (First Edition). Cambridge University Press.
  • Crawley R. A., and Stevenson R. J. (1990). “Reference in single sentences and in texts”. J Psycholinguist Res., 19: 191–210.
  • Crawley, R. A., Stevenson, R. J., and Kleinman, D. (1990). “The use of heuristic strategies in the interpretation of pronouns”. J Psycholinguist Res., 19(4): 245-64.
  • Dowty, D. R. (1986). “The effects of aspectual class on the temporal structure of discourse: Semantics or pragmatics?”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 9(1): 37–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627434.
  • Ferretti, T. R., Rohde, H., Kehler, A., and Crutchley, M. (2009). “Verb aspect, event structure, and coreferential processing”. Journal of Memory and Language, 61: 191-205.
  • Fillmore, C. (1968). The case for case. In Universals in Linguistic Theory, edited by Emmon Bach and Robert T. Harms, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 1–90.
  • Fukumura, K., & van Gompel, R. (2010). Choosing anaphoric expressions: Do people take into account likelihood of reference? Memory and Language, 62, 52–66.
  • Gernsbacher, M. A. (1989). “Mechanisms that improve referential access”. Cognition, 32: 99-156.
  • Gernsbacher, M. A., & Hargreaves, D. J. (1988). “Accessing sentence participants: the advantage of first mention”. Journal of Memory and Language, 27: 699-717.
  • Givon, T. (1989). Mind, Code and Context: Essays in Pragmatics. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Givon, T. (ed.) (1983). Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Golshaie, R., and Incera, S. (2021). “Grammatical aspect and mental activation of implied instruments: A mouse-tracking study in Persian”. J Psycholinguist Res, 50: 737-755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09742-3
  • Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993). “Cognitive status and the form of anaphoric expressions in discourse”. Language, 69: 274–307.
  • Hwang, H. (2018). “Semantic properties of pronouns modulate pronoun use: evidence from Cantonese”. Discourse Process. 55: 92–102. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2016.1218312
  • Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Kaiser, E., Li, D., and Holsinger, E. (2011). “Exploring the lexical and acoustic consequences of referential predictability,” in Anaphora Processing and Applications. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 7099, eds I. Hendricks, A. Branco, S. Lalitha Devi, and R. Mitkov (New York, NY: Springer), 171–183.
  • Madden-Lombardi, C., Dominey, P F., and Ventre-Dominey, J. (2017). Grammatical verb aspect and event roles in sentence processing. PLOS ONE 12(12): e0189919.
  • Maddon, C J. & Ferretti, T. (2009). “Verb aspect and the mental representation of situations”. In the Expression of Time, 217-240.
  • Matlock, T. (2011). The Conceptual Motivation of Aspect. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds), Human cognitive processing: 27. Motivation in grammar and the lexicon (P. 133-147). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Ngo, B. (2019). Vietnamese Pronouns in Discourse. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Rohde, H. & Kehler, A. & Elman, J L. (2006). Pronoun interpretation as a side effect of discourse coherence, Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
  • Salomon, M. M., Magliano, J. P., and Radvansky, G. A. (2013). “Verb aspect and problem solving”. Cognition, 128: 134-139.
  • Stevenson, R. J., Crawley, R. and Kleinman, D. (1994). “Thematic roles, focusing and the representation of events”. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9: 519-548.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics