Study of repair in the telephone and face to face conversations in Lori language (Kohgiluyeh dialect) and Persian language

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 MSc in General Linguistics, Yasouj University

2 Assistant Professor of Linguistics, Yasouj University

3 Assistant Professor, English Department, Faculty of Humanities, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran

10.22084/rjhll.2023.28407.2290

Abstract

Despite the numerous studies regarding repair in different languages, it has not been yet studied in Lori language. The aim of this research is to study the repair in Kohgiluyeh dialect in comparison with that of Persian. The researchers tried to explore the repair strategies, frequencies, and preferences for their use. The sample consisted of 80 male speakers (40 Lori and 40 Persian speakers) whose age ranges from 20-50 years. They were selected from Lori people of Kohgiluyeh and Persian speakers of Bushehr and Ahvaz using convenience sampling. The results, based on the data obtained from 340 minutes of recorded telephone and face-to-face conversations, revealed a strong tendency for the use of self-initiated self-repair. The findings are compatible with the strategies introduced by Schegloff(2013). It was also observed that non-lexical strategies were used more frequently than lexical ones. Also, the repairs are used more in telephone conversations than face-to-face conversations.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  • امینی، حیدرعلی؛ نعمتی، مسیح‌اله و شریفی، شهلا (1393). «انواع ترمیم‌ها و جایگاه آنها در توالی نوبت‌ها در گفت و گوهای روزمره زبان فارسی»، فصلنامه پژوهش زبان و ادبیات فارسی، شماره سی و دوم. 167-183.
  • مقدم‌کیا، رضا و حیدرپور، پانته آ (1390). «بررسی ترمیم‌های گفتاری در زبان فارسی»، مجله پژوهش‌های زبان‌شناسی، سال سوم، شماره اول، 101-114.
  • Al-Harahsheh, A. M. A. (2015). “A Conversation Analysis of self-initiated repair structures in Jordanian Spoken Arabic.” Discourse Studies, 17(4): 397-414.
  • Atkinson, M., and Heritage, J. (1984) Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 266-298.
  • Colman, M., and Healey, P. (2011). “The Distribution of Repair in Dialogue.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 33. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7zd514km
  • Drew, P. (1997). “Open class repair initiators in response to sequential source of troubles in conversation” Journal of Pragmatics, 28: 133-148.
  • Emrani, F. and Hooshmand, H. (2019). “A conversation analysis of self initiated self-repair structures in advanced Iranian EFL learners”. International Journal of language Studies, 13 (1): 57-76.
  • Fox, B. A., Maschler, Y., and Uhmann, S. (2010). “A cross-linguistic study of self-repair: Evidence from English, German, and Hebrew.” Journal of Pragmatics, 42(9): 2487-2505.
  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). “Studies in ethnomethodology.” Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole, and J. L. Morgan. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
  • Haddadian, G., and Mahmoodi-Bakhtiari, B. (2018). “Conversational Repairs in Persian Dramatic Discourse: Akbar Radi's Pellekân (The Steps).” Persian Literary Studies Journal, 7(11): 65-82.
  • Hayashi, G. Raymond, and J. Sidnell (eds) Conversational repair and human understanding, (pp. 41-70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jefferson, G. (2004). “Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction.” In: G. H. Lerner (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. (pp.13-23). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Kormos, J. (1999). “Monitoring and self-repair in L2.” Language Learning, 49 (2): 302-342.
  • Levant, W.   M.  (1989). “Monitoring and self-repair in speech”. Cognition, 14: 41-104.
  • Liddicoat, A. J. (2007a). An Introduction to Conversation Analysis. London: Continuum.
  • Liddicoat, A. J. (2007b). “Internationalising Japan: Nihonjinron and the intercultural in Japanese language-in-education policy.” Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 2(1), 32-46.
  • Maynard، W. (2013). “Everyone and no one to turn to: Intellectual roots and contexts for conversation analysis.” In: J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (eds.) The handbook of conversation analysis, 11-31. United kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Quan, L., and Weisser, M. (2015). “A study of self-repair operation in conversation by Chinese English learners.” System, 49: 39-49.
  • Rieger, C. L. (2003). “Repetitions as self-repair strategies in English and German conversations.” Journal of Pragmatics, 35(1): 47-69.
  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., and Jefferson, G. (1974) “A simplest systematics for the organization of turntaking for conversation” Language, 50(4): 696-735.
  • Saputri, D. Y. (2015). A Conversational Analysis of Repair In Ellen Degeneres Show Season 11. Thesis: Yogyakarta State university.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1979). “Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings.” In Psathas, G. (ed) Everyday Language Studies in Ethno Methodology. 23-78. NewYork: Irvington Publishers.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (2000). “Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language in society, 29(1): 1-63.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis I, (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (2013). “Ten operations in self-initiated, same-turn repair”. In, M.
  • Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., and Sacks, H. (1977). “The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation.” Language, 53(2): 361-382.
  • Tang, C. (2011). “Self-Repair Devices in Classroom Monologue Discourse” Concentric: Study of Linguistics, 37 (1): 93-120.
  • Zhang, W. (1998). Repair in Chinese Conversation. Doctoral dissertation: University of Hong Kong.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics