The Efficiency of PRAAT Application on Teaching Stress Pattern of English Verb-Noun Pairs to Persian Learners

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

PhD in English Language Education, English Language Department, Farhangian University, Mashhad, Iran

10.22084/rjhll.2023.28091.2277

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficiency of Praat software in teaching the stress pattern of verb-noun pairs, which have the same written form, but different grammatical categories. The research method of the present study is quasi-experimental with pre-test and post-test design between experimental and control groups. All subjects read ten sentences containing noun-verb pairs in two stages of pre-test and post-test with an unmarked intonation. In the control group, the stress pattern was instructed using the traditional method through the IPA transcription and repetition. In contrast, the experimental group had the opportunity to use Praat software to record their voice and compare the stress pattern of the recorded word with that of the dictionary. The results showed the experimental group is not significantly different from the words derived from the dictionary group . As a result, they have learned the stress pattern correctly.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  • جوانمردی، سارا (1393). فراگیری واجگونه­های کناری انگلیسی توسط فراگیران فارسی زبان بر مبنای آواشناسی فیزیکی، پایان­نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه یزد.
  • حاتم­پور، حمیده (1393). فراگیری واکه­های انگلیسی توسط فراگیران فارسی زبان بر اساس آواشناسی فیزیکی، پایان­نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه یزد.
  • حق­شناس، علی محمد (1376). آواشناسی. تهران: نشر آگه.
  • صادقی، وحید (1386). «تأثیر دمش بر تقابل واکداری، بی­واکی انسدادی­های فارسی». مجله زبان و زبان­شناسی، 6: 65-81.
  • علی­نژاد، بتول (1392). مبانی آواشناسی آکوستیک،اصفهان: انتشارات دانشگاه.
  • فضائلی­زاده، مریم (1393). فراگیری الگوهای تقابلی تکیه زبان انگلیسی توسط فارسی زبانان بر اساس روش فیزیکی، پایان­نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه یزد.
  • Bengrait, N. (2021). “Pedagogical evaluation and recommendations on software design for English intonation learning”. Journal of English Language Teaching and Literature, 2(1): 69-94.
  • Bengrait, N. (2020). “Analysis of Algerian students’ English intonation deviations with the employment of speech analyzer and Praat programs”. Journal of Studies in Language, Culture and Society, 3(1): 27-65.
  • Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2018). Praat: doing phonetics by computer. Computer Program. Version 6.0.4, retrieved 20 May 2018 from retrieved 20 May 2018 from <http://www.praat.org>.
  • Bolinger, D. L. (1961). “Contrastive accent and contrastive stress”. Language, 37(1): 83-96.
  • Brett, D. (2004). “Computer generated feedback on vowel production by learners of English as a second language”. ReCALL, 16(1): 103-113.
  • Chrabaszcz, A., Winn, M., Lin, C. Y., & Idsardi, W. J. (2014). “Acoustic cues to perception of word stress by English, Mandarin, and Russian speakers”. Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 57(4): 1468-1479.
  • Chou, P. (2005, October). Using the Computer for Practicing Pronunciation in ESL Class. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education(pp. 581-583). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  • Davies, P., & Pearse, E. (2000). Success in English Teaching: A Complete Introduction to Teaching English at Secondary School Level and Above. Oxford University Press.
  • Ferguson, Ch. (1957). “Word Stress in Persian”. Language, 33 (2): 123-135
  • Fry, D. B. (1955). “Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27(4): 765-768.
  • Fry, D. B. (1958). “Experiments in the perception of stress”. Language and speech, 1(2): 126-152.
  • Gorjian, B., Hayati, A., & Pourkhonic, P. (2013). “Using Praat software in teaching prosodic features to EFL Learners”. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 34–40.
  • Hamlaoui, N., & Bengrait, N. (2016). “Using better accent tutor and Praat for the learning of English intonation”. Arab World Journal of English Studies, 7(3): 99-112.
  • Hayati, A.M. (2005). “Computer and language teaching”. Asian EFL Journal, 4: 21-28.
  • Kahnemuyipour, A. (2003). “Syntactic categories and Persian stress”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21 (2): 333-379.
  • Ladefoged, P. (2006). A course in phonetics. UK: Blackwell publishing.
  • Ladefoged, P., & Johnson, K. (2014). A course in phonetics. Cengage learning.
  • Lazard, G. (1959). Grammaire du persan contemporain. Paris: librairie c.
  • Lazard, G. (1992). A grammar of contemporary Persian. Mazda Publishers.
  • Le, H. T., & Brook, J. (2011). “Using Praat to teach intonation to ESL students”. Hawaii Pacific University TESOL Working Paper Series, 9(1, 2): 2–15.
  • Lee, S. T. (2008). Teaching pronunciation of English using computer assisted learning software: an action research study in an Institute of Technology in Taiwan (Published Doctoral dissertation, ACU Research Bank).
  • Lehiste, I. (1970). Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, Mass and London, MIT Press.
  • Magdin, M., Sulka, T., Tomanova, J., & Vozar, M. (2019). “Voice analysis using PRAAT software and classification of user emotional state”. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 5(6): 33-42.
  • Mahootian, S., & Gebhardt, L. (1997). Persian (descriptive grammars). London: Routledge. Doi: 10, 9780203192887.
  • Osatananda, V., & Thinchan, W. (2021). “Using Praat for English pronunciation self-practice outside the classroom: strengths, weaknesses, and its application”. Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(2): 372-396.
  • Rahmatunisa, W., & Syarifudin, S. (2021). “The use of PRAAT in learning English debate in Indonesian EFL classroom”. Indonesian EFL Journal, 7(1), 43-
  • Richards, J. C. (2005). Communicative language teaching today. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
  • Roach, P. (2009). English phonetics and phonology: A practical course. Cambridge university press.
  • Thumawongsa, N., & Getkham, K. (2015). “The impact of computer assisted pronunciation learning program on Thai university students’ pronunciation performance and autonomous learning skill”. Manutsat Paritat: Journal of Humanities, 37: 79-99.
  • Triassanti, R. (2015). Training on word stress of EFL students assisted with Praat program. In A. J. Othaman, N. S. Degang, I. Wiryokusumo, A Susilo, & Mustaji (Eds.), Future education: Shaping intelligent and mannered generation throughout civilization (pp. 381–390). The 6th ICETA International Conference on Education, University of PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya.
  • Wilson, I. (2008). Using Praat and Moodle for teaching segmental and supra segmental pronunciation. In 3rd International World CALL Conference: Using Technologies for Language Learning.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics