No Sex Differences in Phi-Features Processing in Bilinguals: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Study

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD of Linguistics, Linguistics Department, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Psychology, Humboldt University Zu Berlin, Berlin Germany

Abstract

The main focus of the present study is to investigating the sex differences in L1 and L2 Number and Person Phi-features processing of bilinguals. To achieve this goal, the performance of thirty balanced Turkish-Persian bilinguals (15 women) who had learned Persian at school entry, was evaluated by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Both groups displayed significant activation of the Pars opercularis only for the Number feature, whereas the posterior Superior Temporal Gyrus was activated for both Number and Person features. Importantly, no difference was observed in the brain activation patterns in men and women in processing Number or Person Phi-features. In general, our results suggest that Number and Person Phi-features processing may not be influenced by sex differences, age of acquisition or the interaction of these factors, arguing for an indistinguishable syntactic competence of both genders in L1 and L2 for balanced bilinguals.

Keywords

References

– پورمحمد، محمد (1397). روان­شناسی زبان. تهران: سمت.
– خدادادی، مجتبی؛ اسدزاده، حسن؛ کلانتر قریشی، منیر و امانی، حسین (1393). نرم‌افزار حافظة کاری دانیمن و کارپنتر. تهران: مؤسسه تحقیقات علوم رفتاری‌- شناختی سینا.
– میکده، سیمین (1400). بررسی اثرات بسندگی زبان و سن یادگیری زبان دوم بر دستگاه عصبی برای پردازش صرفی- نحوی با استفاده از ERPs و fMRI، رسالة دکتری، دانشگاه تربیت­ مدرس.
– Ackema, P., and Neeleman, A. (2018). Features of Person: From the Inventory of Persons to their Morphological Realization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
– Ackema, P., and Neeleman, A. (2019). “Processing Differences between Person and Number: A Theoretical Interpretation”. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 211.
– Barber, H. and Carreiras, M. (2005). “Grammatical Gender and Number Agreement in Spanish: An ERP Comparison”. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, no. 1: 137-53.
– Baxter, L. C., Saykin, A. J., Flashman, L. A., Johnson, S. C., Guerin, S. J., Babcock, D., and Wishart, H. A. (2003). “Sex differences in semantic language processing: A functional MRI study”. Brain and Language, 84(2): 264–272.
– Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., and Schlesewsky, M. (2013). “Reconciling time, space and function: A new dorsal-ventral stream model of sentence comprehension”. Brain and Language, 125(1): 60e76.
– Burman, D. D., Minas, T., Bolger, D. J., and Booth, J. R. (2013). “Age, sex, and verbal abilities affect location of linguistic connectivity in ventral visual pathway”. Brain and Language, 124(2): 184-193.
– Carreiras, M. Salillas, E. and Barber, H. (2004). “Event-Related Potentials Elicited During Parsing of Ambiguous Relative Clauses in Spanish”. Cognitive Brain Research, 20, no. 1: 98-105.
– Chiu, M. M., and McBride-Chang, C. (2006). “Gender, context, and reading: A comparison of students in 43 countries”. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4): 331–362.
– Dunn, A. L., and Fox Tree, J. E. (2009). “A quick, gradient Bilingual Dominance Scale”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(3): 273–289. 
– Friederici, A. D, Hahne, A. and Saddy. D. (2002). “Distinct Neurophysiological Patterns Reflecting Aspects of Syntactic Complexity and Syntactic Repair”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, no. 1: 45-63.
– Friederici, A. D., Chomsky, N., Berwick, R. C., Moro, A., and Bolhuis, J. (2017). “Language, mind and brain”. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1: 713–722.
– Green, D. W., and Abutalebi, J. (2013). “Language control in bilinguals: the adaptive control hypothesis”. J. Cogn. Psychol. (Hove), 25: 515- 530.
– Hagoort, P. and Brown. C. M. (2000). “ERP Effects of Listening to Speech Compared to Reading: The P600/SPS to Syntactic Violations in Spoken Sentences and Rapid Serial Visual presentation”. Neuropsychologia, 38, no. 11: 1531-49.
– Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J., and Veltkamp, E. (2004). “Is syntax separate or shared between languages?”. Psychological Science, 15(6): 409 - 414.
– Hirnstein, M., Westerhausen, R., Korsnes, M. S., and Hugdahl, K. (2013). “Sex differences in language asymmetry are age-dependent and small: A large-scale, consonant–vowel dichotic listening study with behavioral and fMRI data”. Cortex, 49(7): 1910–1921.
– Hollingshead, A. (1975). Four Factor Index of Social Status. Unpublished
Manuscript. New Haven, CT: Yale University Department of Sociology.
– Hyde, J. S. (2005). “The gender similarities hypothesis”. American Psychologist, 60(6): 581–592.
– Leaper, C., and Smith, T. E. (2004). “A meta-analytic review of gender variations in children's language use: talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech”. Developmental psychology, 40(6): 993–1027.
– Logan, S., and Johnston, R. (2010). “Investigating gender differences in reading”. Educational Review, 62(2): 175–187.
– Mancini, S. (2018). Features and Processing in Agreement. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
– Mancini, S. Molinaro, N and Carreiras, M. (2013). “Anchoring Agreement in Comprehension”. Language and Linguistics Compass, 7, no. 1: 1-21.
– Mancini, S., Quiñones, I., Molinaro, N., Hernandez-Cabrera, J. A., and Carreiras, M. (2017). “Disentangling meaning in the brain: Left temporal involvement in agreement processing”. Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 86: 140–155.
– Meykadeh, A, Golfam, A., Nasrabadi, AM., Ameri, H., and Sommer, W. (2021b). “First Event-Related Potentials Evidence of Auditory Morphosyntactic Processing in a Subject-Object-Verb Nominative-Accusative Language (Farsi)”. Frontiers in Psychology. 16, 12: 698165.
– Meykadeh, A., Golfam, A., Batouli, Sah and Sommer, W. (2021a). “Overlapping but language-specific mechanisms in morphosyntactic processing in highly competent L2 acquired at school entry: fMRI evidence from an alternating language switching task”. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 26; 15:728549.
– Meykadeh, S., Golfam, A., Batouli, SAH, and Sommer, W. (In Press). “The neural basis of Number and Person phi-features processing: An fMRI study in highly proficient bilinguals”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
– Molinaro, N., Vespignani, F., and Job, R. (2008). “A deeper reanalysis of a superficial feature: an ERP study on agreement violations”. Brain research, 1228: 161–176.
– Perani, D., and Abutalebi, J. (2005). “The neural basis of first and second language processing”. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15(2): 202–206.
– Poldrack, R. A. (2007). “Region of interest analysis for fMRI”. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2 (1): 67-70. 
– Sanchis-Segura, C., Ibañez-Gual, M., Adrián-Ventura, J., Aguirre, N., Gómez-Cruz, Á., Avila, C., and Forn, C. (2019). “Sex differences in gray matter volume: how many and how large are they really?” Biology of sex Differences, 10(1): 1-19.
– Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Pugh, K. R., Constable, R. T., Skudlarski, P., Fulbright, R. K., Bronen, R. A., Fletcher, J. M., Shankweiler, D. P., and Katz, L. (1995). “Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language”. Nature, 373(6515), 607–609.
– Sommer, I. E., Aleman, A., Bouma, A., and Kahn, R. S. (2004). “Do women really have more bilateral language representation than men? A meta-analysis of functional imaging studies”. Brain, 127(8): 1845–1852.
– Sommer, I. E., Aleman, A., Somers, M., Boks, M.P., and Kahn, RS. (2008). “Sex differences in handedness, asymmetry of the planum temporale and functional language lateralization”. Brain Res.1206: 76–88.
– Stoet, G., and Geary, D. C. (2013). “Sex differences in mathematics and reading achievement are inversely related: Within-and across-nation assessment of 10 years of PISA data”. PLoS One, 8(3), e57988.
– Ullman, M. T. (2001). “The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4: 105–122.
– Xu, M., Liang, X., Ou, J., Li, H., Luo, Y.-J., and Tan, L. H. (2019). “Sex differences in functional brain networks for language”. Cerebral Cortex. 30 (3): 1528-1537.
– Zawiszewski, A., Santesteban, M., and Laka, I. (2016). “Phi-features reloaded: an
even-related potential study on person and number agreement processing”. Applied Psycholinguistics.
– Zell, E., Krizan, Z., and Teeter, S. R. (2015). “Evaluating gender similarities and differences using metasynthesis”. American Psychologist, 70(1): 10–20.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics