Dialectology studies a dialect scientifically along with its geographical distribution.Each dialect is a language; and to study a dialect various linguistic analyses are required.This property makes the study of a language a little long in terms of time.Collecting dialectical data is very time consuming and required a lot of effort.Raw data is not much usable in dialectology and it is required to add linguistic analyses to the data in the framework of structural linguistic analysis.Using a computer as a research tool causes to prepare the data in a specific structure.The main contribution of the current paper is proposing a standard to organize dialectic data and information.This standard contains the dialectic data, its relevant meta-data, and the linguistic information related to the analysis of this data.The meta-data and linguistic information are organized in the XML tree structure.This data structure is highly portable and it can be easily read into a database.
قیومی، مسعود (1398). «ساماندهی تحلیل های چندلایهای زبان شناختی در پیکرههای زبانی،» در واژهواژه زندگی: جشننامهاستادویداشقاقی، ویراستاران قطره، فریبا و شهرام مدرس خیابانی؛ تهران، ایران: نشر نویسه، 287-312.
Bijankhan, M., J. Sheykhzadegan, M. Bahrani, and M. Ghayoomi (2011). “Lessons from building a Persian written corpus: Peykare”. Language Resources and Evaluation, 45(2): 143–164.
Boisot, M., and Canals, A. (2004). “Data, information, and knowledge: Have we got it right,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14: 43–67.
Bagley, P. (1968). Extension of Programming Language Concepts, Philadelphia: University City Science Center.
Buchholz, S. and Marsi, E. (2006). “CoNLL-X shared task on multilingual dependency parsing,” In Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 149–164.
Burgin, M. (2001). “Information in the context of education,” The Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 14: 155-166.
Burgin, M. (2017). Theory of Knowledge: Structures and Processes. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Capurro, R. (1991). “Foundations of information science: Review and perspectives”, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland, pp. 26–28.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts MIT Press.
de Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de linguistiquegénérale, Lausanne, Paris: Payot.
Dalkir, K. (2005). Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Dretske, F. (2000). Perception, Knowledge and Belief: Selected Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heidegger, M. and Fink, E. (1970). Heraklit, Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
Inmon, W.H., O'Neil, B. and Fryman, L. (2008). Business Metadata: Capturing Enterprise Knowledge. MA: Elsevier Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Landauer, C. (1998). “Data, information, knowledge, understanding: Computing up the meaning hierarchy,” Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, San Diego, California, pp. 2255–2260.
Laudon, K.C. (1996). Information Technology and Society. California: Wadsworth P.C.
Lyons, J. (1981). Language, Meaning and Context. London: Fontana.
Nauta, D. (1970). The Meaning of Information, Paris: Mouton.
Nocedal, A. S., Gerrikagoitia Arrien, J. K., & Burgin, M. (2011). “A mathematical model for managing XML data,” International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 6 (1): 56–73.
O’Brien, J.A. (1995). The Nature of Computers, The Dryden Press, Philadelphia/San Diego.
Okasha S. (2008). Philosophy of Science. Tehran: Farhang-e Moaser.
Poster, M. (1990). The Mode of Information: Post-structuralism and Social Contexts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Quigley, E. J., & Debons, A. (1999). “Interrogative theory of information and knowledge”, In Proceedings of SIGCPR ’99, ACM Press, New Orleans, 4–10.
Rowley, J. (2007). “The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy,” Journal of Information Science, 33 (2): 163–180.
Sharma, N. (2005) The Origin of the “Data Information Knowledge Wisdom” Hierarchy (electronic edition: http://www-personal.si.umich.edu/~nsharma/ dikw_origin.htm)
Van Marle, J. (2008). “Paradigmatic and syntagmatic relations,” Halbband: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung, edited by G. Booij, C. Lehmann, J. Mugdan, W. Kesselheim and S. Skopeteas, Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 225-234.
Weinreich, U. (1954). “Is a structural dialectology possible?” Word, 10: 388–400.
Zins, C. (2007). “Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(4): 479–493.
