Discoursal and Syntactic Differences of It-Cleft and Pseudo Cleft Sentences in Persian

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

It-cleft and pseudo cleft sentences go under cleft structures. In the related literature, their discoursal differences in terms of weight, chain of reference, discourse function and their syntactic differences with regard to the constituent which can possibly appear in the position of the clefted constituent have been shown based on the data from English, and it has been proven that they are not interchangeable. This article – based on Persian data which are gathered from literary, scientific, historical texts and newspapers – tries to see if the same differences are observed in Persian, and if there exists any difference between English and Persian. The data include 105 it-cleft and 67 pseudo cleft sentences

Keywords


احمدی گیوی، حسن و حسن انوری (1385). دستور زبان فارسی 1. تهران: مؤسسه فرهنگی فاطمی.
خرمایی، علیرضا و  افسانه شهباز (a1388) "نقش کانونی سازة گسسته در جملات گسسته" مجلة زبان و زبان‌شناسی، 9: 27-52.
خرمایی، علیرضا، افسانه شهباز، (b1388) "جملات گسسته: دو مقلولة متمایز یا مقوله‌ای واحد؟"، دستور (ویژه‌نامة نامة فرهنگستان)، 5: 51-80.
غلامعلی‌زاده، خسرو (1380)‌ساخت زبان فارسی. تهران: احیاء کتاب.
شهباز، افسانه، (1387) بررسی ساختار اطلاعاتی جملات اسنادی در زبان فارسی. پایان‌نامة کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه کردستان.
مشکوةالدینی، مهدی، (1381) دستور زبان فارسی بر پایه نظریهی گشتاری. مشهد: انتشارات دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد.
Ahmadkhani, M. (2001) Cleft and Pseuodo-Cleft ‍‍Constructions in Persian. MA Thesis, Tarbiat Modarres University.
Collins, P. (1991) Cleft and Pseudo-Cleft Constructions in English. London & New York: Routledge.
Collins, P. (2006) "It-Clefts and Wh-Clefts: Prosody and Pragmatics" Journal of Pragmatics, 38: 1706-1720.
Delin, J. (1989) Cleft Constructions in Discourse. PhD Dissertation No. 34, Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh.
Delin, J. (1990) "A Multi-Level Account of Cleft Constructions in Discourse" Coling 90: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Volume 2, pp:83-88, Helsinki, Finland, August 20-25, 1990.
Delin, J. & J. Oberlander "Cleft Constructions in Context: Some Suggestions for Research Methodology". Information Retrieval. May 26, 2010. [Online]. <http://www.fb10.uni-bremen. de/anglistic/ langpro/projects/gem/delinpublications.html#cleft
Granham, A., J Oakhill & P. N. Johnson-Laird (1982)"Referential Continuity and the Coherence of Discourse" Cognition,11: 29-46.
Hedberg, N. (1990) Discourse Pragmatics and Cleft Sentences in English. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minesota.
Hedberg, N. & L. Fadden. (2007) "Information Structure of It-Clefts, Wh-Clefts and Reverse Wh-Clefts in English", In Nancy Hedberg and Ron Zacharski (eds.), The Grammar-Pragmatics Interface:Essays in Honor of Jeanette K. Gunde, 49-76. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lambrecht, K. (2001) "A Framework for the Analysis of Cleft Constructions" Linguistics,  39: 463-516.
Prince, E (1978) "A Comparison of Wh-Clefts and It-Clefts in Discourse" Language, 54: 883-906.
Rahbarnia, S. (1996) "A Contrrastive Study of English and Persian Cleft Structures" Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22: 19-28.
Weinert, R. & J. Miller (1996) "Cleft Constructins in Spoken Language" Journal of Pragmatics, 25: 173-206.