Frame Semantics and Discourse Analysis: The case of Misinterpretation and Misunderstanding in Some Persian Conversations

Document Type : Research Paper

Abstract

According to Lee (1997; 2001), frame as one of the fundamental concepts in cognitive linguistics, can be employed for the analysis of discourses including conversations. To this end, the present study attempts to analyze some Persian conversations by applying the concept of Frame as an analytical tool. The analysis of a number of exchanges in the daily Persian reveals that frames are useful for the interpretation of many important utterances. In other words, without a common frame a conversation can easily lead to a misinterpretation or misunderstanding. The main argument, however, will be that communication disorder, created by differences in frames, can be explained on two levels. Sometimes there are different kind of frame in participants' mind; in these situations, we can observe the hearer's misinterpretation or misunderstanding. In other situations, one definite frame includes different concepts in participants' mind, which causes misinterpretation for the hearer.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

-  اردبیلی، لیلا (1392)، نگاهی به زبان‌شناسی حوزه ادراک: رویکردها و مفاهیم، ویژه‌نامه زبان و متن، شماره 3، 42-49.
-  مافی‌نژاد، ندا (1375)، تحلیل گفتمان و تعابیر معنایی دارای ابهام، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، مشهد: دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد.
-  یزدانی، نسترن (1389)، بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر بروز سوءتعبیر، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، تهران: دانشگاه الزهرا.
-  Amouzadeh, Mohammad & Tavangar, Manoochehr (2005), Sociolinguistic transfer: the case of Persian speakers in Australia, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol.147-148, 63-78.
-  Bateson, Gregory (1972), Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.
-  Brown, Gillian & Yule, George (1983), Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-  Ensink, Titus & Sauer, Christoph (2003), Social-functional and cognitive approaches to discourse interpretation: The role of frame and perspective. In T. Ensink & Ch. Sauer (Ed.), Framing and Perspectivising in Discourse (pp 1-21). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
-  Evans, Vyvyan, & Green, Melanie (2006), Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
-  Fillmore, Charles J. (1975), An alternative to checklist theories of meaning, Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Amsterdam: North Holland, 123–131.
-  Fillmore, Charles J. (1976), The need for a frame semantics within linguistics, Statistical methods in linguistics, 5–29.
-  Fillmore, Charles J. (1977), Scenes-and-frames semantics, in A. Zampolli (ed.), Linguistic Structures Processing. Amsterdam: North Holland, 55–82.
-  Fillmore, Charles J. (1982), Frame semantics, in Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing, 111–137.
-  Fillmore, Charles J. (1985a), Frames and the semantics of understanding, Quaderni di Semantica, 6, 222–254.
-  Fillmore, Charles J. (1985b), Syntactic intrusions and the notion of grammatical construction, Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 11, 73–86.
-  Fillmore, Charles J. (2006), Frame Semantics, In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings (373-400). Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
-  Goffman, Erving (1974), Frame analysis. An essay on the organization of experience. NewYork etc.: Harper & Row.
-  Gordon, Cynthia (2015), Framing and positionin, In D. Tannen, H. Hamilton and D. Schiffrin (eds.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 2nd edition, vol. 1(pp. 324-345). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
-  Greco Morasso, Sara (2012), Contextual frames and their argumentative implications: a case-study in media argumentation. Discourse Studies, 14(2), 197 –216.
-  Gumperz, John J. (1982), Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-  Hymes, Dell (1974), Ways of speaking. In R. Bauman & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (433–451). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-  Kun, Yang; Canzhong, Jiang & Jiewei, Liu (2015), Frame Theory and Its Application to Discourse-based English Listening Teaching, International Research in Education, Vol. 3, No. 1, 54-64.
-  Lee, David A. (1997), Frame conflicts and competing construals in family argument, Journal of pragmatics, 27, 339–360.
-  Lee, David A. (2001), Cognitive Linguistics: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-  Minsky, Marvin (1975), A framework for representing knowledge, In P. H. Winston (ed.), The psychology of computer vision (211–277). New York: McGraw Hill.
-  Orr, Joanna (1996), A Comparative investigation into the structure of arguments: Frame Semantics and Conversation Analysis. M.A. Thesis. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
-  Riesbeck, C. K. (1975), Computational understanding, In Schank R. C. and B. L. Nash Webber (eds.) Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Proccessing. Cambridge, Mass: Bolt, Beranek & Newman.
-  Rojo Lopez, Ana Maria (2002), Frame Semantics and the Translation of Humor. Babel, 34-77
-  Saville-Troike, Muriel (1982), The ethnography of communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
-  Schiffrin, Deborah (1994), Approaches to discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
-  Tannen, Deborah (1993), what’s in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations'. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Framing in Discourse (14–56). New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-  Tracy, K. (1997), Interactional trouble in emergency service requests: A problem of frames. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30, 315–343.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics