Lexicography in the Framework of Cognitive Linguistics

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Scientific board/ Guilan University

Abstract

Passing nearly forty years of introducing cognitive Linguistics in 1970s and 1980s as a flexible approach consisting of different theories which have originally common basis, theoretical framework of this discipline of linguistics has applied to other disciplines. In This period, lexical studies have been the major interest of cognitive Linguists having had a profound impact on it and renewed lexical studies. The present article addressing the question of how and to some extent it is possible to use the achievement of cognitive linguistics in scientifically and practically dictionary compiling, discusses three aspects of the Cognitive conception of lexical semantic structure: the importance of prototypically effects for lexical structure, the intractability of polysemy, and the structured nature of polysemy. Each of the above mentioned points inspires a specific conclusion for some of the significant theoretical concepts and principals of Cognitive Linguistics that it vindicates existing aspects of lexicographical practice.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

-  امامی، کریم (1385)، فرهنگ معاصر کیمیا (فارسی – انگلیسی)، تهران: انتشارات فرهنگ معاصر.
-  انوری، حسن (1381)، فرهنگ بزرگ سخن، تهران: انتشارات سخن.
-  راسخ­مهند، محمد (1392)، درآمدی بر زبان­شناسی شناختی (نظریه­ها و مفاهیم)، تهران: انتشارات سخن.
-  سعادت، اسماعیل (1384)، دانشنامه زبان و ادب فارسی، تهران: فرهنگستان زبان و ادب فارسی، جلد 1.
-  فیاضی، مریم سادات (1388)، بررسی و تحلیل پدیده­ی چندمعنایی در زبان فارسی: رویکردی شناختی، رساله­ی دکتری، تهران: دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.
-  فیاضی، مریم سادات و صافی، حسین (1389)، «نقش زبان­شناسی شناختی و نقش­گرا در فرهنگ­نگاری»، نخستین همایش فرهنگ­نویسی علامه دهخدا، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، 119-128.
-  قطره، فریبا (1386)، «نقش زبان­شناسی در فرهنگ­نویسی امروز». فرهنگ­نویسی، 1، (1)، 68- 93.
-  Croft, W., (1990), Syntactic categories and Grammatical Relations: the cognitive organization of information, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
-  Croft, W. and Cruse, A.D., (24), Cognitive Linguistics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
-  Crystal, D., (1991), A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, Oxford, Blackwell.
-  Fillmore, C.J., 1976b, “The need for frame semantics within linguistics”, Statistical Methods in Linguistics,12,5-29.
-  Fillmore, C.J., (1977), ‘Scenes and frame semantics’, 55-81, in A. Zampolli, Linguistic Structures Processing, Amsterdam and New York, North Holland Publishing Company.
-  Fillmore, C.J., (1982), ‘Frame Semantics’, 111-137, in Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Linguistic Society of Korea, Seoul, Hanshin.
-  Geeraerts, D. (2007), ‘lexicography’, 1160-1174, in D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
-  Lakoff, G., (1973),‘Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts’, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2, 458-508.
-  Lakoff, G., (1987), Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the mind, Chicago, Chicago University Press.
-  Langacker, R.W., (1990), Foundations Of Cognitive Grammar, Vol., 2, Stanford, Stanford University Press.
-  McCawley, J.D., (1981), Everything that Linguists have always wanted to know about logic but were ashamed to ask, Oxford, Blackwell.
-  Sweetser, E., (1984), From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
-  Taylor, J. R., (1995), Linguistic Categorization, Prototypes in Linguistic Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 
-  Traugott, E. C., (1974), ‘Explorations in Linguistic Elaboration; Language Change, Language Acquisition, and the Genesis of Spatio-Temporal Term s’, 263-314, in J. M. Anderson and C. Jones (Eds.), Historical Linguistics, Amsterdam.
-  Wittgenstein, L. (1953), Philosophical Investigations, Oxford, Blackwell.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics