Comparative Linguistic Research

Comparative Linguistic Research

Investigating the Interaction of Progressive Aspect and Aktionsart in Persian

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
Zhaleh Makaremi
Shoja Tafakkori Rezayi 1
Vali Rezaei 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences. Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran.
10.22084/rjhll.2021.23660.2112
Abstract
Aspect is divided to lexical and grammatical types. Lexical aspect is derived from verb meaning and its subtypes are states, activities, achievements and accomplishments; Grammatical aspect is represented by inflection or some auxiliary verbs and includes perfective, imperfective, perfect and prospective ones. The present paper, in the framework of Role and Reference Grammar, studies the interaction of Aktionsart and progressive aspect in Persian verbs. It is usually accepted that states, don’t appear with progressive aspect, while “waxing or waning situations, agentivity and temporary situations”, pave the way for them to be used with progressive aspect. Activities are mostly compatible with progressive as their dynamicity is in accord with progression. Achievements are usually regarded unacceptable, but they can have different readings in progressive aspect including preliminary process, slow motion, iterative, futurate progressive and commentary reading. Accomplishments due to being durative and having stages, are acceptable in progressive aspect.
Keywords
Aktionsart
Grammatical Aspect
Progressive Aspect
Role and Reference Grammar. Persian Language
  • اکاتی، فریده و عطاالله سنچولی (1397). «نمود استمراری در زبان فارسی براساس نظریۀ پیش­نمونگی»، مجلۀ زبان­پژوهی دانشگاه الزهرا(س)، سال دهم، شمارۀ 29: 219-241.
  • دبیرمقدم، محمد (1384). پژوهش­های زبانشناختی فارسی، تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
  • دستلان، مرتضی و همکاران (1395). «نمود در زبان فارسی؛ نگاهی نو برپایۀ رویکرد شناختی بسط استعاری و مؤلفه­های نمودی»، جستارهای زبانی، شمارۀ 3، پیاپی 31: 69-86.
  • جهان­پناه تهرانی، سیمین­دخت (1363). «فعل­های لحظه­ای و تداومی»، مجلۀ زبان­شناسی، سال اول، شمارۀ 2: 64 -100.
  • راسخ­مهند، محمد (1388). گفتارهایی در نحو، تهران: نشر مرکز.
  • رضایی، والی (1391). «نمود استمراری در فارسی معاصر»، فنون ادبی، سال 4، شمارۀ 1: 79-92.
  • طبیعی، مریم و همکاران (1394). «بررسی نمود استمراری و تام در زبان اشارۀ ایرانی»، پژوهش­های زبانشناسی، سال 7، شمارۀ 1، شمارۀ ترتیبی 12: 65-76.
  • فرشیدورد، خسرو (1383). فعل و گروه فعلی و تحول آن در زبان فارسی، تهران: سروش.
  • فضیلت، محمد و همکاران (1397). «نمود استمراری در فارسی دری افغانستان»، ویژه­نامۀ فرهنگستان، دستور، شمارۀ 14: 3-16.
  • گلفام، ارسلان (1385). اصول دستور زبان، تهران: انتشارات سمت.
  • ماهوتیان، شهرزاد (1383). دستور زبان فارسی از دیدگاه رده­شناسی، ترجمۀ مهدی سمایی، تهران: نشر مرکز.
  • نغزگوی‌کهن، مهرداد (1389). «افعال معین و نمایش نمود در زبان فارسی»، ادب­پژوهی، شمارۀ 14: 93-110.
  • ویسی­حصار، رحمان و سلیمانی، حبیب (1398). «عملگرهای ناقص­ساز در زبان فارسی: رویکردی شناختی». پژوهش­های زبانشناختی در زبان­های خارجی، دورۀ1، شمارۀ 9: 269-298.
  • Bach, E. (1986). "The Algebra of Events", Linguistics and Philosophy. 9, 5-19.
  • Baker, C. L. (1995). English Syntax, 2nd edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Biber, D., S. Johansson, G. Leech, S. Conrad and E. Finegan. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
  • Brinton, L. J. (1988). The Development of English Aspectual Systems: Aspectualizers and Post- Verbal Particles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bybee, J and Ӧ. Dahl. (1989). The Creation of Tense and Aspect Systems in the Languages of the World. Studies in Language 13: 51-103.
  • Bybee, j. L. (2003). “Aspect”. In: Frawley, W.J. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Second Edition. Oxford: OUP. 157-158.
  • Carlson, L. (1981). "Aspect and Quantification". In P. Tedeschi and A. Zaenen (Eds.), Tense and Aspect, Volume 14 of Syntax and Semantics, pp.31. New York: Academic Press.
  • Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Comrie, B. (1987). The world's Major Languages. London: Routledge.
  • Dahl, Ӧ. (1985). Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Davari, Sh. And M. Naghzguy-Kohan. (2017). The Grammaticalization of Progressive Aspect in Persian. In: The Grammaticalization of Tense, Aspect, Modality and Evidentiality: A Functional Perspective. Hengeveld, Kees, Narrog, Heiko and Olbertz, Hella (Eds). Series: Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs. Amsterdam: De Gruyter Mouton.
  • Declerck, R. (1991). Tense in English: Its structure and Use in Discourse. London: Routledge.
  • Denison, D. (1998). Syntax, the Cambridge History of the English Language. IV: 1776-1997, ed. By Romaine, Suzanne, 92-329, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Deshores, S. C. and P. Rautionaho. (2018). “The Progressive Versus Non-progressive Alternation: A Semantic Exploration Across World Englishes”. English world-wide, 39 (3): 309-337.
  • Dinni, L and P. M. Bertinetto. (1995). "Punctual Verbs and the Linguistic Ontology of Events". Paper presented at Fact and Events Conference, Trento.
  • Dowty, D.R. (1979). Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
  • Evans, V., and M. Green. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics. An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Filip, H. (1999). Aspect, Eventuality Types and Nominal Reference. New York: Routledge.
  • Foley, W and R. D. Van Valin. (1984). Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Greenbaum, S., and R. Quirk. (1990). A Student's Grammar of the English Language. London: Pearson English Language Teaching.
  • Gyarmathy, Z. (2015). "Achievements, Durativity and Scales". PhD diss., Heinrich-Heine-Universitat Dusseldorf.
  • Huddleston, R., and G.K. Pullum. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Johannsdottir, K. M. (2011). "Aspects of the Progressive in English and Icelandic". PhD diss., University of British Columbia (Vancouver).
  • Kanijo, P.S. (2019). “Aspectual Classes of Verbs in Nyamwezi”. PhD diss., University of Gothenburg, Göteborg.
  • Kranich, S. (2008). "The Progressive in Modern English. A Corpus-based Study of Grammaticalization and Related Changes", Unpublished PhD diss., Freie Universitat Berlin.
  • Krifka, M. (1989). Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution and Quantification in Event Semantics. In Semantics and Contexual Expression, eds. Renate Bartsch, Johann van Benthem and Peter van EmedeBoas, 75-115. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
  • Lee, S.A. (2015). "Aktionsart, Progressive Aspect and Underspecification". Linguistic Research, 32 (1), 151-193.
  • Leech, G. and J. Svartvik. (2002). A Communicative Grammar of English. London: Longman.
  • Leech, G. N, M. Hundt, Ch. Mair and N. Smith. (2009). Change in Contemporary English: A grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Leech, G. N. (2014). Meaning and the English Verb. London: Routledge.
  • Lӧbner, S. (2013). Understanding Semantics. London: Routledge.
  • Mair, Ch. (2006). Twentieth-century English. History, Variation and Standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Martin, F. (2010). “Revisiting the Distinction between Accomplishments and Achievements”. In W. de Mulderm J. Mortelmans and T. Mortelmans (Eds.), From Now to Eternity. Volume 22 of Cahiers, Amsterdam/New York, 43-64. Rodopi.
  • Michaelis, L.A. (2004). Type Shifting in Construction Grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics. 15(1): 1-67.
  • Pavey, E. L. (2010). The Structure of Language, An Introduction to Grammatical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Payne, T. E. (2011). Understanding English Grammar: A linguistic introduction. Cambridg: Cambridge University Press.
  • -Peck, J., Lin, J., Sun, Ch. (2013). “Aspectual Classification of Mandarin Chinese Verbs: A perspective of scale structure”. Language and Linguistics. 14(4), 663-700.
  • Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, and J. Svartvik. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman: New York.
  • Rӧmer, U. (2005). Progressives, Patterns, Pedagogy. A corpus-driven approach to English progressive forms, functions, contexts and didactics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Smith, C. S. (1997). The Parameter of Aspect. (Second Edition) London: Kluwer Academic Press.
  • Smith, N. (2005). A corpus-Based Investigation of Recent Change in the Use of the Progressive in British English. Unpublished PhD diss., Lancaster University.
  • Smitterberg, E. (2005). "The progressive in 19th Century English: A Process of Integration". Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics (54). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
  • Tavangar, M and M. Amouzadeh. (2006). "Deictic Projection: An Inquiry into the Future-oriented Past Tense in Persian", Studia Linguistica 60(1): 97-120.
  • Vafaeian, Gh. (2018). Progressive in Use and Contact: A descriptive, areal and typological study with special focus on selected Iranian Languages. PhD diss., Stockholm University, Sweden.
  • Van Valin, R. D. and R. J. Lapolla. (1997). Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Vendler, Z. (1957). "Verbs and Times". The Philosophical Review, 66, 143-160.